| |
The replacement of the scroll by the codex shows that the law of progress affects also the type of support used for texts. A technology of writing which is better suited to the communication of ideas will necessarily replace the former one. The question today is to determine whether the new digital environment will take over the book or if a way of reading perfectly suited to the book, like the one needed for reading a novel, will fade away and slowly disappear.
Various formats of print other than the book are circulating today, such as the newspaper and the magazine. Nevertheless, all these formats share the same characteristic : they consist of pages through which one can flip.
The book is mainly associated with the novel, a genre that gained a wide acceptance one century after Gutenberg and which came to be seen as the epitome of literature. The novel requires a “reading pact” with the reader characterized by its totality and its continuity. A continuous reading of the book, following the order set by the author, is a precondition for the reader to experience the satisfaction promised by the novel and to eventually arrive at a better understanding of life, himself or the society.
Very different from the book, the newspaper asks for a completely different reading pact. The reader may scan the titles and catch just a few sentences of an article before going to another one, much like a bee going from one flower to another. This way of reading is encouraged by the organisation of the articles (the so-called inverted pyramid), the numerous subtitles and the disposition by columns on the page.
The magazine elicits still a different reading pact. Its format is better suited to a continuous reading than the newspaper, but it is still possible for the reader to flip through a variety of subjects, in search of something of interest.
Although these formats have existed for almost two centuries, the magazine is presently winning a greater part of the time devoted to reading, at the expense of the novel.
The arrival of the WWW has created a new situation. With its rapidly growing mass of information on any subject, the Web is the apotheosis of the Book, the ultimate library.
This new library, however, is not built upon the book but upon the database model, which elicits its own textual organization. When assembling a database, one does not try to keep the readers continuously reading, but to answer their questions as effectively as possible. The tabular disposition of the various fields of the database on the screen allows the reader to select the exact piece of information desired. Very often, the best databases are a mix of bits of information and small narratives related to them. For example, a big database like All Movie Guide offers for each movie a plot synopsis, a review of the movie, a biography of the director and the actors, as well as links to other related movies. This mode of organization encourages a way of reading that is very focused, although limited in the time spent continuously on a same subject. And it does not exclude the serendipity generally associated with literary works.
The newspaper and the magazine migrated very easily to this environment while the novel has resisted. Various reasons oppose the reading pact of the novel migrating easily to the screen.
i. The book consists of a foliated space which allows the copresence of the pages that have been read and those still to be read. It provides the readers with an analog mark signalling their position in the totality of the text. ii. Pagination gives a digital mark to the same effect. It allows the reader to finely tune the time dedicated to reading. iii. The text is printed without all the lateral distractions of a web page, which eliminates the temptation to zap out at any moment.
iv. The dedication of the reader is facilitated by the extraordinary handiness of the book.
In order to display a text on a screen, one has to choose between two possibilities : either vertical scrolling, which goes back to the old age of the volumen, or the lateral flip of virtual pages. The scrolling is not adequate for a long text because it does not allow the readers to manage their time nor to easily find the place where they stopped at a previous session. The lateral flip takes away the illusion of the presence of the previous pages. This inconvenience can be compensated by various visual metaphors. One of these is to reproduce on the screen a digital clone of the printed page, as they did with the e-book.
The ideal solution would be an object like the codex, with multiple pages of a flexible material that could be read in any position without the necessity of a backlight and consuming a very small amount of energy.
This object is on its way, with the technology being developed by E ink Corporation. They have already designed a material which is half the thickness of a credit card. Some big publishers have a partnership with that company.
With this kind of digital codex, the book would be born again as a complex tool able to combine the functions of a book, a personal computer, a personal digital assistant and a writing tablet. The digital codex would allow our society to get out of the schizophrenic situation in which we are today, where the works most patiently researched, written and edited are divorced from the medium that could give them the greatest audience and circulation, a medium that embodies today the very ideal of the book as a vehicle to communicate from mind to mind through time and space. |
 |
 |
|
Pâte (à papier) feuilletée !
(1 reply)
Patrick Altman, Jan 14, 2003 10:34 UT
|
|
Quid des autres usages de l'espace feuilleté ?
(1 reply)
Pierre Schweitzer, Dec 14, 2002 23:45 UT
|
|
Que représente le livre dans l'univers du numérique ?
(2 replies)
Gautier Poupeau, Dec 3, 2002 22:03 UT
|
|
Re-optimizing the Virtual Book 
Stevan Harnad
Dec 2, 2002 13:49 UT
Let me first agree with Christian Vandendorpe that it will be a good idea -- pedagogically as well as intellectually and aesthetically -- to restrain the reader's (and especially the student-reader's) ready addictivity to hypertext-hopping (and not just for novels). Just as we do not put channel zappers in concert halls and cinemas (and not just because many are watching the same concert or movie!), some texts are written for serial reading, not for sight-bites.
Having said that: No one knows which features of Gutenberg reading are truly optimal for the brain, and which were simply accommodations to its papyrocentric initial conditions and their limitations. I suspect that inasmuch as serial reading/writing resembles serial listening/speaking, as in the oral tradition, it is probably drawing on many of the same specific cerebral adaptations.
We do interrupt (both our listening and our reading) sometimes, to seek other information (reminders of what we have already heard/read, definitions, supplementary information, comparisons to other passages or other texts, footnotes, etc.) -- even multimedia interactions, as in interrogating a speaker about a text we are reading.
The "virtual book" -- a hypothetical entity I introduced in the text-e symposium as a thought-experiment -- will look like a book, with covers, pages, portability, etc. (though its size, shape and weight may differ, depending on which papyrocentric features we find useful to retain). However, it will be any/every book, because the text will be piped into it via a telemetric internet connection, and the pages will merely be simulated pages, every word hyperconnected to every other word and document in the sky.
In the text-e symposium Dan Sperber speculated (I think correctly) that a good deal of future writing will be spoken ("dictascript") rather than keyed. By the same token, many of the hypertext interactions with the virtual book (queries, hops) may prove more useful if they are oral, or hybrid oral/digital (where "digital" means letting your fingers do the pointing or hopping by touching hypertext or hop-history/index listings).
I don't think that the notion of a "scroll" will be useful in much of this, any more than the notion of a "tape" is particularly useful to oral conversation. We can only take in a finite discursive "chunk" at a time; that is the immediate object of our senses and intellect. The rest is merely virtual, rather like our memories and our plans and reasoning, but it is also sequential and ongoing.
These hybrid modes of navigating virtual text will be integrated by the mind in ways we have yet to try and test, and to optimize the virtual book so as to adapt to.
|
| |
|
3 replies to Re-optimizing the Virtual Book:
|
| |
|
|
Rendez à César...
Christian Vandendorpe, Feb 2, 2003 20:02 UT
|
| |
|
|
Rendez à César...
Christian Vandendorpe, Feb 2, 2003 19:56 UT
|
| |
|
|
Content and format
Gloria Origgi, Dec 3, 2002 21:22 UT
|
|
Trois questions, au moins
(1 reply)
Rémi Froger, Nov 28, 2002 15:15 UT
|
|
Comparaison
(0 replies)
Clotilde Lampignano, Nov 28, 2002 8:24 UT
|
|
Quelle est la vraie valeur ajoutée du feuilletage ?
(5 replies)
Jean-Michel Salaün, Nov 26, 2002 18:17 UT
|
|
|
Note: yellow triangles ( ) indicate new messages that have been posted since your last visit to the site.
|
|