| |
Modérateurs
·Roberto Casati
·Gloria Origgi
·Luc Schneider
·Judith Simon
·Giuseppe Veltri
Invités
·Ahrash Bissel
·Veronica Boix Mansilla
·Katy Borner
·Nicolas Bullot
·Cristiano Castelfranchi
·Steve Fuller
·Karim Gherab
·Grit Laudel
·Clifford Lynch
·Enrico Negro
·Geoff Nunmberg
·Joseph Reagle
·Nicola Spotorno
·Bob Stein
·Dario Taraborelli
·Jesùs Vega
·Giuseppe Veltri
|
|
En partenariat avec
· LIQUIDPUBLICATIONS
|
|
Peer-to-peer review
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
I propose to focus, then, not just on the technological changes that many believe are necessary to allow academic publishing to flourish into the future, but on the social, intellectual, and institutional changes that are necessary to pave the way for such flourishing. In order for new modes of communication to become broadly accepted within the academy, scholars and their institutions must take a new look at the mission of the university, the goals of scholarly publishing, and the processes through which scholars conduct their work.
Date de publication : 15 octobre 2008
Qu'est-ce que la science peut apprendre de Google?
Chris Anderson
Date de publication : 5 décembre 2008
Back to Basics: How Technology and the Open Source Movement Can Save Science
David Koepsell
This paper argues that the golden age of science was never fully realized, and in the 20th Century became an unlikely ideal. Corporate and university cultures, combined with the realities of the marketplace for publishing, ensured that the ideal methodology of the sciences could not be put into practice. Only now, with the growth of the Open Source Movement, and the success of open wikis, can the scientific ideal, by which theories and hypotheses are aired for public and scientific scrutiny, flourish. But for this to happen, old notions of peer review, academic standards of publication and tenure review, and government sponsorship based upon the above, will all need to adjust accordingly.
Date de publication : 1 octobre 2008
|
|
