| |
Moderators
·Carlo Iacovini
·Gloria Origgi
Guest Panel
·William Black
·Sandra Bonfiglioli
·Enrique J. Calderòn
·José Capel Ferrer
·Sebastian de la Rica
·Andrew Gillespie
·Walter Hecq
·Per Homann Jespersen
·Donald Janelle
·Dominique Laousse
·Lars Lundqvist
·Emmanuel V. Marmaras
·Csaba Orosz
·Stephen Perkins
·Karl-Heinz Posch
·Francesca Racioppi
·Aisling Reynolds-Feighan
·Piet Rietveld
·Werner Schönewolf
·Lanfranco Senn
·Marleen Stikker
·Robert Stussi
·Tony Travers
·Serge Wachter
|
|
Mo.Ve is a Permanent International Non-Governmental Observatory on Sustainable Mobility.
A panel of international experts selected by the organizing committee and coordinated by Guido Martinotti, urban sociologist and Pro-Rector of the Milano-Bicocca University, discusses and comments on Martinotti's position paper on Governance, Technologies and Social Exclusion in the New Metropolis. To visualize the text and take part into the discussion, click on the title of the paper.
Read all the details about the Mo.Ve Observatory 2003 and the on line supporting papers for the present discussion In partnership with
|
|

Governance, Technologies and Social Exclusion in the New Metropolis
Guido Martinotti Guido Martinotti opens the discussion with a text that is a follow-up of the themes discussed at the MO.VE. 2002 International Forum held in Venice in October 2002. The paper will focus on:
a) Case studies of governance models of metropolitan mobility
b) Smart technologies for the observation of mobility
c) Mobility and social exclusion
Date of publication: 14 October 2003
Governance model in the mobility system in Genoa
Alberto Santel From 1999 up to now, the city of Genoa decided to implement coordinated strategies to reduce the impact of transport and mobility systems in the urban centre of Genoa. In order to achieve this target, the Municipality of Genoa has been carrying out some “traffic-environment” integrated politics, aiming at protecting the urban environment and introducing effective environmental sustainability measures, that we report here.
Date of publication: 8 October 2003
Project. Amsterdam Real Time
Waag Society Every inhabitant of Amsterdam has an invisible map of the city in his/her mind. The way he or she moves about the city and the choices made in this process are determined by the mental map. Amsterdam RealTime attempts to visualize these mental maps through examining the mobile behavior of the city's users.
Date of publication: 26 September 2003
Case Study. The Bremen 2030 Project
Ulrich Mückenberger During the two year duration of the "Bremen 2030" project, Bremen city districts have been able to examine prospects for establishing mobility and time agreements and take their first steps in agreeing to time structures with male and female city residents, businesses, transit providers, and commercial enterprises. This included working on a guiding vision that encompasses international knowledge of the problems and prospects for city development and formulates guidelines for a time-oriented city policy.
Date of publication: 26 September 2003
|
|